banner-casestudies

Case Study - "Hurricane Pam"

"Hurricane Pam" Southeast Louisiana Catastrophic Hurricane Planning Project

Hurricane PamBefore the onset of the 2004 hurricane season, IEM, with a team of three subcontractors, was awarded a FEMA contract to support catastrophic planning for Southeast Louisiana. The goal of the project was to develop a functional, scenario-based exercise that would drive the writing of Incident Action Plans for catastrophic hurricane response and build the foundation for Functional Plans. Ultimately, these plans would serve as a "bridging document" between local and state plans and the National Response Plan (NRP).

Hurricane Pam "planning exercise" resulted in usable plans.

The Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Planning Project (known as "Hurricane Pam") was an innovative concept that combined two facets of emergency management: planning and exercises. The full process of planning, training, and exercising can take several years to complete. "Hurricane Pam" was a "planning exercise" designed to create usable action plans in a short timeframe via scenario-driven decision making.

The initial eight-day exercise in July 2004 involved more than 300 participants from 13 parishes; more than 15 federal departments and agencies; more than 20 state agencies; FEMA Headquarters; FEMA Regions I, II, IV, V, and VI; the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (now the Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, or GOHSEP); the States of Mississippi and Arkansas; and numerous volunteer agencies.

Planning, operational personnel sitting together to plan.

Participants (both planners and responders) were provided with a catastrophic hurricane scenario, a set of consequences that would result from that scenario, and assumptions designed to stress the emergency management system and force thinking on critical planning topics. Groups were established to focus on developing action plans for six primary areas determined by FEMA and the State of Louisiana prior to the workshop: Search and Rescue, Temporary Medical Care, Sheltering, Temporary Housing, Schools, and Debris. As the exercise unfolded and additional topics of concern came to light, IEM established new groups to focus on building action plans for those areas.

Functional action plans developed from Hurricane Pam exercise.

Drafts of 15 action plans were produced during the course of the first exercise, along with associated action plans, checklists, and trigger points. As the planning proceeded, it became evident that multiple workshops would be required. Three additional "Hurricane Pam" workshops were conducted before Hurricane Katrina struck on August 29, 2005:

  • "Hurricane Pam" Phase 1A was held November 29-December 3, 2004, in New Orleans. Attended by approximately 100 officials, this workshop focused on Temporary Housing, Temporary Medical Care, and Sheltering.
  • "Hurricane Pam" Phase 1B was conducted July 25-29, 2005, in New Orleans, and was attended by 100 officials. This workshop focused again on Temporary Housing and addressed a new topic: Transportation, Staging, and Distribution of Critical Resources.
  • On August 23-24, 2005, the Temporary Medical Care Supplementary Planning Workshop was held in Carville, Louisiana. It was attended by approximately 80 officials. This was the third workshop addressing medical issues.

Living document to be continually improved.

The consolidated document developed from the "Hurricane Pam" workshops was intended to be a living document, continually improved through workshops and exercises. The success of the exercise-driven planning process developed by IEM indicates that it will serve as a valuable tool for future catastrophic planning projects, and the action plans developed through "Hurricane Pam" lay the foundation for more detailed catastrophic planning in the future.

For more information about Hurricane Pam, see:

U.S. Senate Comments on Hurricane Pam (2006)

“Hurricane Pam 2004 was more than an exercise. It was a unique planning endeavor that resulted in functional plans that were considered for and actually put to use in real-life situations before, during, and after Hurricane Katrina.”
—From “Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared.” Report of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, May 2006.
icon-redarrow Read Senate Committee Report

“The hypothetical problems identified in Pam predict[ed] with eerie accuracy the all-too-real problems of Katrina—overcrowded shelters undersupplied with food, water, and other essentials; blocked highways with thousands of people trapped in flooded areas; hospitals swamped with victims and running out of fuel for their emergency generators. The list goes on and on.
—Senator Susan Collins, during the 2006 Senate Hearing on Hurricane Pam (Senate Hearing 109-403)
icon-redarrow
Read Senate Hearing Testimony

 

IEM Testimony to U.S. House of Representatives (2014)

“The most pressing issues facing the Nation’s rail and highways … include the transportation of higher volumes of crude oil via rail, the flammability of Bakken crude, the need for investments in safer rail cars, and the growing risks posed to densely populated and rural areas by crude oil and other hazardous materials. “
—From “Hearing on Oversight of Passenger and Freight Rail Safety, U.S House of Representatives, February 26, 2014
icon-redarrow Read House Testimony Report